Emule Mods

Area News => News dal mondo eMule => Topic iniziato da: tux. - 01 Luglio 2013, 16:29:44



Titolo: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 01 Luglio 2013, 16:29:44
Codice:
- improved: merged a few general code improvements from NetF WARP mod [NetFinity]
- improved: merged a few Kad code improvements and fixes from kMule mod [WiZaRd]

- fix (b): fixed a fix from beba v2.70 [Tuxman]
- fix (b): fixed score calculation with the Analyzer CS [Tuxman]
  * probably broken since beba v1.0; well then.

 :angel:

Si prega di verificare il calcolo del punteggio per incongruenze...  :nono2:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/50y1i6q72m3xxe1/nightlybin.7z
https://www.dropbox.com/s/i8hh8pbamoj7ot1/nightlysrc.7z


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 01 Luglio 2013, 16:43:44
I'm very glad you (and Wizard) are still active in the "emule-project", unlike most developers who have by now left the project  :sad:
I'm testing our new beba  :clap:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 01 Luglio 2013, 16:45:08
Some of us return every now and then, like Netfinity ... :) ...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: sbi82 - 01 Luglio 2013, 20:35:36
Hi tux!

Glad to see you are still working on my favourite mod... Thank you!  :cheers:

I'll give a try right now!


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 01 Luglio 2013, 20:36:47
Thanks for testing!  :good:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 03 Luglio 2013, 15:42:10
Updated to beta 2 with a link to beba's (all-new) version check in the logs.  :)

(For the translators: There's one new string, a second one will follow in beta 3.)

Codice:
IDS_BEBA_VERSION_CHECK  "Click here to check if a new beba version is available"
IDS_BEBA_VCHECK_INFOTEXT "Note that this only checks for a new version of the official eMule client. New beba versions are not affected."


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 03 Luglio 2013, 19:28:28

(For the translators: There's one new string, a second one will follow in beta 3.)


About beba's translators ......... I do not know wo they are (Darkforge?) and if they are still in activity, but if you are searching for new translators ...... here we are  :whistling:

PS: I do not want to replace (or to start a war with) the old translators so, if they are reading this, keep doing your great work  :good:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 03 Luglio 2013, 19:32:25
I'm pretty sure they'll read this here as this is the only Italian beta board for me.  :grin:
But you're right, I should post a link there. Thanks for the reminder!


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 03 Luglio 2013, 22:46:44
You're welcome  :wink:
If you need some help .... here we are  :cheers:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 03 Luglio 2013, 22:51:19
Yup: Please check if the upload scoring ("On Queue" list) seems to be ok, with and without Analyzer CS enabled.

(Without Analyzer CS: "Bad" clients should not be punished so much. With it: They should have a very low rating.)


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: dylandog84 - 03 Luglio 2013, 23:39:27
I tried to enable/disable the CA and it happened what you wrote.
In my queue list i have many clients with the default nickname and when i do a test like this i'm confuse. In this case, i would like to see a feature like funny nick.  :angel:

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 03 Luglio 2013, 23:41:25
Uhm. Just for clarification: The Analyzer CS is not the Analyzer, it only affects the scoring, not the bad client punishment itself.  :bounce:
Thanks for the test! (Could you give me a screenshot of your queue with Analyzer CS disabled? Just curious. Mine is not long.)

Also, no, there won't be funny nick. Deal with it.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: dylandog84 - 03 Luglio 2013, 23:59:41
Also my queue list isn't too long because i'm testing just for few hours...

This is my queue list with Analyzer CS disabled:

http://i.imgur.com/1cOEEpQ.png




Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 04 Luglio 2013, 00:08:29
Looks reasonable. Nothing is broken then.  :76:

Thank you!
Now I'll do some fine-tuning, maybe improve some small things...

Please report any crashes BEFORE the release this time!  :wink2:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: dylandog84 - 04 Luglio 2013, 00:11:59
Citazione
Please report any crashes BEFORE the release this time!
Of course, i won't forget this time!!  :tongue:

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 04 Luglio 2013, 13:18:29
Very strange thing that happens to me  :think:
Take a look to the attachments. Three "bad clients" are highlighted. The first one seems to be all right, with and without Analyzer CS enabled (Ratio and Score changes); the second and the third .... no change!!


EDIT: in a second try, they are both changed like the first one. I don't know why!


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 04 Luglio 2013, 13:37:12
Yay. Not reproducible issues!  :bounce:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 08 Luglio 2013, 00:25:54
Any actual bugs (which can be reproduced) or crashes lately? Exiting beba and stuff works?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 08 Luglio 2013, 09:06:25
No crashes for me. Long life to beba  :thumbup:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: dylandog84 - 08 Luglio 2013, 10:25:45
The same for me. Great work Tux.  :)


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 08 Luglio 2013, 14:58:22
Great!

Final beba will be released in the evening if nothing explodes until then, thank you. :)


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 08 Luglio 2013, 16:59:18
http://forum.emule-project.net/index.php?showtopic=84237  :bounce:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: sbi82 - 08 Luglio 2013, 17:23:07
Great work tux!  :cheers: :cheers:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 08 Luglio 2013, 17:25:27
 :wub:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 30 Luglio 2013, 10:13:14
Ehilà :hello: credo di avere un problemino con la beba... Qualche giorno fa di punto in bianco non riuscivo ad accedere alla 2.72 che comunque già utilizzavo dal suo rilascio (al tentativo di avvio saltava fuori impossibile accedere al dispositivo... è probabile che non si disponga delle autorizzazioni necessarie).

Dopo alcuni tentativi infruttuosi avevo deciso di rimuovere il file emule.exe e riscaricare i binari, e qui sta il fattaccio: sia dai due link qui nel forum che dal link ed2k preso dal sito della beba di Tux. scarico un file che, una volta scansionato (Kaspersky Internet Security 2013) mi segnala un Trojan dropper all'interno del file emule.exe... Ho già fatto vari tentativi e il risultato è sempre quello.

Dai link del forum ho allora preso giù qualche altro binario di varie mods a caso (l'ultima kMule, NetF WARP 0.3a, beba 2.70 e 2.71...) e risultano alla scansione tutte "sanissime". Ora mi alterno tra beba 2.70 (dopo aver risolto il problema dell'accesso: l'antivirus aveva messo - improvvisamente e senza motivo apparente - la beba nella lista di applicazioni scarsamente attendibili, è bastato rimuoverla da lì) e l'ultima build di kMule, però mi sembrava opportuno segnalare questo comportamento strano, magari qualcuno ha già avuto problemi simili ma ad occhio nel forum non ne ho trovati...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 30 Luglio 2013, 10:16:06
Il vostro programma antivirus è una m***a.

(Addendum: Perché non può maledire qui?  :ranting: )


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 30 Luglio 2013, 10:29:27
Not bad, considering that it costs me at least fifty euro a year :asd:... you say this "for fame" or because of this particular case?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 30 Luglio 2013, 10:30:34
I say this because antivirus software is always snake oil software. Also I'm rather convinced that beba contains no malware.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 30 Luglio 2013, 10:54:57
Sono d'accordo con tux. Ma perchè siete tutti fissati con antivirus pesanti quanto inutili ? :think:

E li pagate anche :asd:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 30 Luglio 2013, 13:32:40
Per me è solamente un problema di "falso positivo", tipico di Kaspersky e di Avira (questi due programmi mi hanno sempre dato molti falsi positivi). Con Avast free nessun problema

IMHO it is just a case of "false positive", a typical situation with Kaspersky and Avira (these two programs have always given me a lot of false positives). No problem with Avast free

Il vostro programma antivirus è una m***a.

(Addendum: Perché non può maledire qui?  :ranting: )

Just because kids are watching us  :wink2:



Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 30 Luglio 2013, 13:38:06
Hi kids!  :doofywave:

- Do you really think kids today will become violent just because they know how to swear?  :think:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 30 Luglio 2013, 13:56:14
No I don't, but it's only a kind of respect for those who don't like that kind of "expressions".
In my "real life" I usually use too many bad words, but I'm trying to stop it  :asd:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 30 Luglio 2013, 13:57:05
Now that's quite American. "Let's ban everything that's bad, it will magically disappear!"


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 30 Luglio 2013, 14:20:07
Caustico :asd:
Oh well, nothing left to do but wait for a new beba version and hoping it could befriend my snake oil... no hurry :whistling:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 30 Luglio 2013, 14:21:01
Uninstall your snake oil, maybe.  :tongue:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 30 Luglio 2013, 14:24:22
Uninstall your snake oil, maybe.  :tongue:

Agree, your PC will give thanks message :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 11 Agosto 2013, 18:06:20
The next beba version will be v2.80 or v3.00 (yet to be decided) and based on eMule 0.50b. The list of changes is already prepared. In case you want to start beta testing, grab the current kMule SVN code (or wait for the next release) and try the new clipboard watcher.

 :whistling:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 11 Agosto 2013, 18:21:33
The list of changes is already prepared.

Where is this list? No sign on EP  :whistling:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 11 Agosto 2013, 18:25:24
In my dropbox, well hidden.

Short overview:

Codice:
* merge eMule 0.50b
   * remove beba improvements which are part of the new official code
* add the Clipboard Watchdog (from kMule by myself)
* add MediaInfo.dll auto update (from kMule by WiZaRd)
   * remove the .url file from the beba package
* fix a grammar issue in the credits ;-)
* default toolbar set to "small icons, labels on the right" (because I like that)

 :bounce:

Any wishes?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 11 Agosto 2013, 21:38:46
In my dropbox, well hidden.

Short overview:

Codice:
* merge eMule 0.50b
   * remove beba improvements which are part of the new official code
* add the Clipboard Watchdog (from kMule by myself)
* add MediaInfo.dll auto update (from kMule by WiZaRd)
   * remove the .url file from the beba package
* fix a grammar issue in the credits ;-)
* default toolbar set to "small icons, labels on the right" (because I like that)

 :bounce:

Any wishes?

Yessss! As I said in the past (cause I keep open many search tabs), I'd like to move each tab in "search results" page, changing their position (for example, moving the 10th tab between second and third ......)
Alternatively, I'd like to have these tabs in two or more lines, as I can see all tabs without scrolling them.
 :-[


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 11 Agosto 2013, 21:47:19
Why do you keep many tabs open at all? Search results are not fetched automatically.  :think:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 11 Agosto 2013, 22:04:57
Because every day I repeat my searches for many "new episodes" and I prefer to see all keywords in the tabs without the needing of saving a title list in a txt file and write it on emule again and again.
This is the same thing that I do on Firefox; many tabs open so I can surf from one to another very fast  :wink2:

Citazione
Search results are not fetched automatically

Yes, they are!


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 11 Agosto 2013, 22:14:26
Oh.

Hm, not sure if the SysTabControl32 supports moving tabs. According to the internet, it doesn't. (Basically I'd have to recode everything related to them.  :think:)


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 11 Agosto 2013, 22:41:13
beba! First mod in the story ..... with moving tabs!!  :bounce:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 11 Agosto 2013, 22:47:41
If I were you, I'd suggest that to the official devs.  :bounce:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 11 Agosto 2013, 22:52:29
If I were you, I'd suggest that to the official devs.  :bounce:

Official dev( s ) is open to new suggestions? Since when?  :whistling:  :whistling:  :whistling:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 11 Agosto 2013, 23:22:08
Oh, they are...

Latest 0.50b SVN includes WinSock2 support (from eWombat, back in 0.30x days) and a fix for a bug reported in 0.50a.  :asd:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 13 Agosto 2013, 02:28:21
eMule 0.50b-SVN beba v3.00 build 130813-1 is ready:

Codice:
- merged: eMule 0.50b
  * replacing some of beba's improvements

- added: Clipboard Watchdog [Tuxman]
  * provides a more elegant way to watch the clipboard for eD2k links
- added: MediaInfo.dll update [WiZaRd]
  * automatically updating the MediaInfo.dll for a better user experience

- improved: added Client Analyzer status icons [WiZaRd]

- changed: beba is using a smaller toolbar by default now :-) [Tuxman]
- changed: grammar fix in the credits [Tuxman]

Expect it to explode. This is not ready for production yet.
If you feel like using early-alpha-somewhat-code, contact me.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 13 Agosto 2013, 08:41:29

If you feel like using early-alpha-somewhat-code, contact me.

I'd like to try it  :bounce:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 13 Agosto 2013, 14:26:29
PM.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 13 Agosto 2013, 14:37:21
Tnx. Test in progress .....


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 13 Agosto 2013, 14:48:03
I think there are some strange problems. Two crash in five minutes without any apparent reason. After the dmp window, beba closed itself.
I send you two dmp files.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 13 Agosto 2013, 14:50:57
Known problem with the new WinSock2 implementation, probably (without having looked at the dump files). I told you it will explode.

But I'll see if I can work around it.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 13 Agosto 2013, 14:51:19
Hi tux, if you want I have some free time for help you.

But there is the assertions system like in kMule (debug build) ?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 13 Agosto 2013, 14:52:53
No. :D


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 14 Agosto 2013, 08:19:49
Citazione
eMule v0.50b | beba v3.00 Statistics [beba.eMuleFuture.de]

Session
   Runtime: 2:28 Hours
   Transfer Time: 2:28 Hours (99.9%)
      Upload Time: 2:28 Hours (99.9%)
      Download Time: 44:24 Minutes (29.9%)
   Current Server Duration: 0 Seconds (0.0%)
   Total Server Duration: 0 Seconds (0.0%)

It doesn't crash here :tongue:

It seems to work without problem, as far I see in the UI and in Verbose log :angel:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 14 Agosto 2013, 08:55:48
It doesn't crash here :tongue:

It seems to work without problem, as far I see in the UI and in Verbose log :angel:

I use Windows 7 - 32 bit. What do you use?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 14 Agosto 2013, 08:57:33
I use Windows 7 - 32 bit. What do you use?

64bit :asd:

I'm surprised about the ram usage of this mod that is really low, even if I not used eMule so much since a lot of time :think:

Look like a morph4u's LPE more or less... because actually I'm using everything that could increase ram usage and cpu that LPE doesn't have.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 14 Agosto 2013, 09:12:03
I don't know this "alpha version" but with beba 2.72 the RAM usage is only 30 Mb. I don't have much files in download, but I never seen a high value


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 14 Agosto 2013, 09:14:20
Actually I takes only 22 mb, with 1 download, a short queque but verbose log on.

@thor: skype? :tongue:

ps: Safe writing of .met is on exit bug verbose says that clients.met is saved every some time in verbose, is normal ? I don't remember... :think:

2nd ps:

(http://i.imgur.com/SnN3Twp.jpg)

I have very often situation silimar to these, and idk if nowadays is normal...

Citazione
eMule v0.50b | beba v3.00 Statistics [beba.eMuleFuture.de]

Upload Sessions: 52
   Total successful upload sessions: 46 (88.46%)
   Total failed upload sessions: 6 (11.54%)
   Average Uploaded Per Session: 3.52 MB
   Average upload time: 8:00 Minutes


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 14 Agosto 2013, 10:07:30

2nd ps:

(http://i.imgur.com/SnN3Twp.jpg)

I have very often situation silimar to these, and idk if nowadays is normal...


The same here. I don't know why  :think:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 14 Agosto 2013, 10:14:11
(http://i.imgur.com/GDonQQm.jpg)

Nothing strange in verbose log about 0b/s clients... apparently.

ps: If there is drop blocking sockets feature, surely doesn't work :asd:
And seems that those clients always come back fur SUQWT, I'll make next run with probablistic queque and see if something change...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 14 Agosto 2013, 11:09:34
Told you this is alpha code..

Neo: will come back to your pm later.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 14 Agosto 2013, 11:15:44
Told you this is alpha code..


The same thing happen to me with beba 2.72 stable version. Sometimes, one or two (random) slots go to zero and after a few seconds come back to normality


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 14 Agosto 2013, 11:43:00
Told you this is alpha code..

That's why I asked if you need help :bounce2:

...but seems that regarding the upload issues is avaible also in old bebas, no one noticed it yet ? :badmood:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 14 Agosto 2013, 13:45:19
Maybe no one cared?  :wink2:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 14 Agosto 2013, 14:51:28
Maybe no one cared?  :wink2:

What a betatesters... :spank:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 16 Agosto 2013, 20:07:55
Updating beba with small fixes (yes, including the missing mod strings) and latest eMule Mercurial code.  :)

Give me some time to upload, try it in a couple of hours or so.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 16 Agosto 2013, 20:34:55
I wish a switch to come back with offi tray icon  :angel:

I hate the bunny


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 16 Agosto 2013, 20:36:26
Denied.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 16 Agosto 2013, 21:26:41
The bunny is untouchable!!  :angry2:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 17 Agosto 2013, 06:53:22
The mule is untouchable!! :angry2:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 17 Agosto 2013, 14:55:10
Go away!


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 17 Agosto 2013, 19:11:01
Go away!

 :tongue:

You did not take a look yet about upload issues that I reported ? :search:

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 17 Agosto 2013, 19:13:43
Turn off Slot Focus and test if it works...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 17 Agosto 2013, 19:25:12
Turn off Slot Focus and test if it works...

You mean set more slot ? It was not a focus, there is the focus in beba ?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 18 Agosto 2013, 09:53:22
You mean set more slot ? It was not a focus, there is the focus in beba ?

beba Slot Focus (http://www.emule-mods.it/forum/index.php?topic=338.0#post_focus)

right clic on one client listed in upload list ....
(http://www.emule-mods.it/immagini/guide/beba/beba%20v2.70/beba_listaclientup_v2.70.png)


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 18 Agosto 2013, 09:58:41
I wasn't using the slotfocus then :-[


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 06 Settembre 2013, 09:04:34
Any news?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 06 Settembre 2013, 16:01:39
No. Currently improving default settings and testing new ideas.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 06 Settembre 2013, 18:04:39
Nothing about this upload issue ? :-[


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 06 Settembre 2013, 18:05:17
No clue.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 07 Settembre 2013, 13:34:53
No clue.

Any specific test could help?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 07 Settembre 2013, 13:36:49
A clue would help.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 07 Settembre 2013, 18:04:14
A clue would help.

Ask... :pardon:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 10 Novembre 2013, 17:42:05
 :hello:
Any news? Some time ago checking my queue I saw someone who was using "eMule v0.50b [beba v3.00]", so I was just wondering about that.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 10 Novembre 2013, 17:44:59
Well, no. Keeping the code base up-to-date with the CVS ...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 10 Novembre 2013, 18:29:14
Well, no. Keeping the code base up-to-date with the CVS ...

There's not so much that you can do until they finish 0.50b... oh yeah, maybe fix the upload issue... or maybe is related to 0.50b code... :think:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 10 Novembre 2013, 18:30:13
I'd assume so. My own changes shouldn't have caused that.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 10 Novembre 2013, 21:01:04
I'd assume so. My own changes shouldn't have caused that.

But I don't know if it was present in old bebas... :hammer:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 10 Novembre 2013, 21:05:44
Check that.  :bounce2:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 11 Novembre 2013, 09:21:52
I'm busy with kMule und Neo actually... but if after final 0.50b release there is still the problem, and it mean the problem is surely in beba, I'll check it :good:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 11 Novembre 2013, 13:03:07
and it mean the problem is surely in beba

Actually it doesn't.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 11 Novembre 2013, 19:53:31
Actually it doesn't.

We'll see. let me focus on kMule stupid FW status bug :angry2:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 11 Novembre 2013, 19:55:02
At least that's a problem I encountered too.  :asd:

BTW, latest kMule beta features eMule 0.50b's upload code...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 12 Novembre 2013, 07:33:28
At least that's a problem I encountered too.  :asd:

Can you explain it to wiz? I'm gonna be angry I repeated that thousand of times and he still says is normal :angry2:

Regarding the upload, it works perfectly :whistling:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 12 Novembre 2013, 15:27:46
Can you explain it to wiz?

I did.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 12 Novembre 2013, 16:09:48
Update.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/50y1i6q72m3xxe1/nightlybin.7z
https://www.dropbox.com/s/i8hh8pbamoj7ot1/nightlysrc.7z


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 12 Novembre 2013, 17:44:43
Update.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/50y1i6q72m3xxe1/nightlybin.7z
https://www.dropbox.com/s/i8hh8pbamoj7ot1/nightlysrc.7z

Is this a beta version? However .... I'm using it from about 10 seconds  :dribble:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 12 Novembre 2013, 17:48:14
It won't be final before eMule is.  :bounce:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 12 Novembre 2013, 18:33:22
It won't be final before eMule is.  :bounce:

changelog? :whistling:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 12 Novembre 2013, 18:33:42
Included.  :asd:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 12 Novembre 2013, 19:10:59
Citazione
Tuxman's eMule beba

- CHANGELOG -
_______________________________________________________
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

v3.00 [noitide sdrawkcab eht]
This should have been v2.80; however, a new eMule is in town, so I pushed it. Maybe I should have used NetFinity's version scheme from the beginning, this would have been beba 0.4 then or something. Sigh. - Thanks to the guys on eMule-Mods.it and Jason for testing this beba version from the beginning so I could squash some bugs.

* ............, 2013

- merged: eMule 0.50b

- added: Clipboard Watchdog [Tuxman]
  * provides a more elegant way to watch the clipboard for eD2k links
- added: MediaInfo.dll update [WiZaRd]
  * automatically updating the MediaInfo.dll for a better user experience

- improved: added Client Analyzer status icons [WiZaRd]
  * technically added but disabled in beba for now
- improved: beba displays "(Proxy)" in the status bar if a proxy is connected [Tuxman]
- improved: eMule's Hard Limit box is greyed out when Auto Hard Limit is enabled [Tuxman]

- fix (b): beba didn't show mod versions in the sources list [Tuxman]
- fix (b): Internet Security Zone settings were not saved [Tuxman]

- changed: added EditBinX and ReplaceVistaIcon to the sources packages [Tuxman]
- changed: ASFU reload intervals are now customizable (as in StulleMule) [Stulle/MoNKi]
- changed: beba is using a smaller toolbar by default now :-) [Tuxman]
- changed: Client Analyzer information in the clients dialog is now more verbose [WiZaRd]
- changed: grammar fix in the credits [Tuxman]


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 12 Novembre 2013, 20:02:01
why tux do you haven't  posted this open beta also in the emulefuture forum ?

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 12 Novembre 2013, 20:05:31
Because I forgot.  :harhar:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 14 Novembre 2013, 09:08:17
Citazione
Thanks to the guys on eMule-Mods.it and Jason for testing this beba version from the beginning
Allora la persona con beba v3.00 che un paio di mesi fa ho visto più volte nella mia coda, era probabilmente qualcuno del forum :)

However, yesterday I noticed a strange thing on v3.00: every time I enter/change a server I get a failed attempt ("...appears to be full") immediately followed by a successful connection to the same server ("Connection established on:...").


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 14 Novembre 2013, 11:13:07
Something strange is happening here!!! Yesterday everything was all right with beba 3.0
Today, when I open it, a mediainfo.txt update start automatically (???) and then beba disappear!! Watching on task manager .... here it is .... but it's not possible to end the task.
All is ok with previous versions
Windows 7 - 32 bit
 :wacko: :wacko: :wacko:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 14 Novembre 2013, 16:08:35
I think my problem is not due to beba. I have many problems with some software. My computer is near to a very big format!!  :sorry:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 14 Novembre 2013, 17:08:45
Fine.  :bounce:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 15 Novembre 2013, 15:16:04
Second day testing beba 3.00 on Windows 7 - 64 bit. Everithing is all right  :bounce:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Marco Detto Buffer - 15 Novembre 2013, 18:41:29
non riesco ad installare la lingua italiana... è normale???



Sistema Operativo: Linux Mint 15 64 bit :)


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 15 Novembre 2013, 18:51:46
Me too  :-[


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 15 Novembre 2013, 21:39:18
Shouldn't be a problem linux related...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 16 Novembre 2013, 10:46:05
I have to check more times, but I have the same problem on my (new  :wink2:) Windows 7 - 64 bit


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 16 Novembre 2013, 14:06:01
Citazione
I have to check more times, but I have the same problem on my (new  ) Windows 7 - 64 bit
Same here (Win 7 - 32 bit).
This morning the program icon has self-changed to a smiley with a pirate hat. Cute, but I changed it back to my beloved white bunny :)


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 17 Novembre 2013, 23:27:08
 :blink:

Mhm. Probably a Copy&Paste problem. I'll check that, thanks.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 19 Novembre 2013, 01:48:42
Hmm.

Regarding the language file: There is none yet.

Regarding the icon issue: Which icon has changed?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 19 Novembre 2013, 09:25:45
Hmm.

Regarding the language file: There is none yet.


The old one does not work on this new version?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 19 Novembre 2013, 09:56:38
Citazione
Regarding the icon issue: Which icon has changed?
(http://i39.tinypic.com/fdyaup.jpg)

I don't think it's a serious problem, but if I'm not wrong (can't remember) the default beba icon is the mule with sunglasses. Times ago I changed it to the white bunny, but two morning ago it switched by itself to the happy pirate smiley, near to the left.

BTW, in the uploading tab I also noticed the "open treasure chest" icon next to a client. What does it means?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 19 Novembre 2013, 10:16:56
BTW, in the uploading tab I also noticed the "open treasure chest" icon next to a client. What does it means?



Citazione
+ Feature request: added additional CA icons, depending on the CA status/score [WiZaRd]
 * angry pirate: very bad
 * black skull: bad (score < 0.5)
 * closed treasure chest: unknown (score < 1.3)
 * open treasure chest: good (score < 3.0)
 * happy pirate: very good

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 19 Novembre 2013, 10:23:56
Ops :tongue: Grazie ss1900!


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 19 Novembre 2013, 17:36:58
The old one does not work on this new version?

New eMule versions always break language files. They always did.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 19 Novembre 2013, 23:50:46
BTW, in the uploading tab I also noticed the "open treasure chest" icon next to a client. What does it means?

I'd consider this to be a bug BTW. Thanks for pointing it out.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 20 Novembre 2013, 00:04:31
Updating 7z archives. Could you please test if all icon weirdnesses are gone once the upload is complete? Also, I'd still need more feedback for the other changes.  :whistling:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 20 Novembre 2013, 08:07:10
Updating 7z archives. Could you please test if all icon weirdnesses are gone once the upload is complete? Also, I'd still need more feedback for the other changes.  :whistling:

Which otheer changes? :bounce2:

Dunno if will try it with the actual upload issue, cuz I'm busy with Neo and kM.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 20 Novembre 2013, 11:07:01
I don't understand what icons are you talking about. No new icons in my upload list

About other changes:

Citazione
- added: Clipboard Watchdog [Tuxman]
  * provides a more elegant way to watch the clipboard for eD2k links

I don't see any change, but maybe it's an invisible change


Citazione
- added: MediaInfo.dll update [WiZaRd]
  * automatically updating the MediaInfo.dll for a better user experience

It works fine ...... but I'll disable this function  :tongue:


Citazione
- improved: eMule's Hard Limit box is greyed out when Auto Hard Limit is enabled [Tuxman]

It works fine


Citazione
- fix (b): beba didn't show mod versions in the sources list [Tuxman]

It works fine

Citazione
- changed: beba is using a smaller toolbar by default now :-) [Tuxman]

Yessss .... but I prefer the largest one  :asd:


We have to wait for a new official emule 0.50b italian language? I hope no  :-[


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 20 Novembre 2013, 17:12:30
I don't see any change, but maybe it's an invisible change

Basically, I recoded the "automatically take ed2k links from clipboard" function (is still a large "TODO" in official eMule sources) and wonder if it works for anyone.

It works fine ...... but I'll disable this function  :tongue:

Why?  :)

We have to wait for a new official emule 0.50b italian language? I hope no  :-[

Not if you create one.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 20 Novembre 2013, 19:50:06
Why?  :)

Because I hate all things that run automatically both on  Windows and on any software. I prefer to run automatically only (few) important software/functions.

Not if you create one.

Ok. Let's talk about it by mail ....... tomorrow


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 20 Novembre 2013, 19:52:11
Because I hate all things that run automatically

beba is designed to do as much as possible without having to let the user decide.  :wink2:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 20 Novembre 2013, 20:14:05
beba is designed to do as much as possible without having to let the user decide.  :wink2:

I WANT to decide for all things  :asd:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 20 Novembre 2013, 20:27:43
Don't use beba then.  :harhar:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 20 Novembre 2013, 20:44:16
beba forever!! Best mod in the universe!!!!  :harhar:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 20 Novembre 2013, 20:46:12
OK. :(


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 21 Novembre 2013, 10:03:06
Citazione
Could you please test if all icon weirdnesses are gone once the upload is complete?

After a day, in the DL tab I found a client with a skull. As you can see, it's not related to a bad behaviour:
(http://i41.tinypic.com/2ik7hj6.jpg)

Besides, I also found (in UL tab) another client, this time behaving badly (many fast XS, some failed UL), but there was no skull next to his name.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 21 Novembre 2013, 17:22:28
Hmm, that had been a CA problem for years...  :nono2:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 30 Novembre 2013, 14:41:45
A minor thing that I've noticed: the "Download" and "Close all search results" buttons in the search tab, maybe needs a little graphical fix...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 30 Novembre 2013, 14:42:59
This is due to Visual Studio 2010. If I knew how to fix, I would. Same issue in kMule ...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Marco Detto Buffer - 02 Dicembre 2013, 16:13:33
(https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31852493/fb/Screenshot%202013-12-02%2015.42.png)

 :wacko:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 02 Dicembre 2013, 16:24:32
Mi successe la stessa cosa qualche mese fa, però con il Kaspersky (vedi dalla risposta #24 in poi di questo stesso thread). E' probabilmente un falso positivo; all'epoca risolsi tornando alla beba v2.71, ma oggi puoi anche decidere di passare alla v3.00 beta...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 02 Dicembre 2013, 17:14:22
Damn, you found the trojan.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 02 Dicembre 2013, 17:21:05
conoscendo tux sara' un falso positivo ! :tongue: comunque il trojan te lo segnala nel file bin e non l'exe ( se non hai gia scompattato ) . a me con outpost pro security suite non segnala nulla .

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Marco Detto Buffer - 02 Dicembre 2013, 17:31:34
gia scompattato mi segnala proprio emule.exe :P


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Marco Detto Buffer - 02 Dicembre 2013, 17:31:51
Damn, you found the trojan.

 :asd:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 12 Febbraio 2014, 00:40:03
Ho aggiornato gli archivi, questa volta senza un virus ...  :asd:

Citazione
Changelog:
* adapted latest eMule code changes, hopefully providing a more stable upload.

YES, THIS IS STILL A BETA!


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 12 Febbraio 2014, 10:22:26
Tnx Tux  :bounce:

Citazione
https://www.dropbox.com/s/50y1i6q72m3xxe1/nightlybin.7z
https://www.dropbox.com/s/i8hh8pbamoj7ot1/nightlysrc.7z


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 12 Febbraio 2014, 11:22:57
I have a problem with the new beta: for some reason kad remains firewalled. Reverting to the previous beta (0.50.1.8) kad works well as always.
Also, with the new beta I got an error that I had never seen before: Error [SERVER NAME] ([SERVER IP]) - Too many files republished by your client software. Please upgrade it.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 12 Febbraio 2014, 17:01:23
Is UPnP enabled? Does it work on "official" .50b "nightly"?

How many files do you share?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 12 Febbraio 2014, 18:53:35
I have a problem with the new beta: for some reason kad remains firewalled. Reverting to the previous beta (0.50.1.8) kad works well as always.

Same problem here with this new beta version. UpNp is disabled. 75 files on my share list


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 12 Febbraio 2014, 18:57:13
Hmm. Does anyone of you happen to have the previous beta's src files?  :eh:

(However, the Firewalled issue seems to come from the official code...)


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 12 Febbraio 2014, 19:30:58
Is UPnP enabled? Does it work on "official" .50b "nightly"?
How many files do you share?
UPnP is enabled, I ticked even the "use UPnP to setup ports" (prior, it was disabled), but it's not able to setup port forwardings.
Well... I don't know which one is the official 0.50b nightly :-[ I used beba v2.71/2.72, then I've tried v3.00 [0.50.1.8] until today, when I started using v3.00 [0.50.1.10].
Now I'm sharing 1454 files.

Hmm. Does anyone of you happen to have the previous beta's src files?  :eh:
Hm, no...

EDIT: oh wait, "nightly" is the codename of the official 0.50b? Not of one of beba versions? In this case, I never tried it...



Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 12 Febbraio 2014, 19:42:18
There are eMule 0.50b "official" alpha builds, latest one from yesterday AFAICS, where beba is based upon.  :)


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 12 Febbraio 2014, 19:52:31
Uh, ok I'm quite ignorant in that, and not a good tester at all :)


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 12 Febbraio 2014, 20:01:44
All testers are good testers.  :wink:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 12 Febbraio 2014, 20:09:34
Coming back to your previous beta (dated november 2013) all things are fine. Mybe is an "official new bug"  :whistling:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 12 Febbraio 2014, 20:15:21
Depends if you can reproduce it with the official *mule.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 12 Febbraio 2014, 20:30:16
For some reason I now have (on 0.50.1.10) a high ID, after nearly an hour of connection. Looking through the verbose, I see that UPNP has tried desperately to do its job:
- Traversing the service list of UPnP device failed.
- upnp: Event Subscription Failed
- No more available UPnP implementations left
Then it looks like an external kad port was found. I did a ports test, which failed due to UDP.

Just to point it out, the error message about the too many files etc. comes out exactly 4 minutes after each server connection/change ok, not true, after 15 minutes since the last server change is not happened yet :P


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 16 Febbraio 2014, 23:13:47
Interesting.

Well, just testing a bit. Indeed, it takes suspiciously longer to get a High ID now...

I just updated the archives with latest eMule upstream changes and MiniUPnP 1.9.  :)
My beba has a High ID with it.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 17 Febbraio 2014, 00:42:59
BTW, I mis-merged this version.  :wink2: So there's one "if" too much, but that shouldn't affect functionality.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 17 Febbraio 2014, 12:55:24

I just updated the archives with latest eMule upstream changes and MiniUPnP 1.9.  :)
My beba has a High ID with it.

Still low id here  :sad:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 17 Febbraio 2014, 14:29:10
Same here :sad: Basically, the only difference I noticed from 0.50.1.10 (and from my previous comment) is that after 4 hours I still not get an high ID kad...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 17 Febbraio 2014, 14:30:03
Why does it work for me?

Anything possibly relevant in the verbose log?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 17 Febbraio 2014, 14:42:40
Hmm, actually, some hours ago I get in the verbose an error message that I've never seen before, so I copypasted it. You have to translate it, also because I do not know what it means despite being in Italian:
Error: Client UDP socket, failed to receive data from [SOMEBODY'S IP]: Error 10040: Le dimensioni del messaggio inviato su un socket di datagramma sono maggiori del buffer interno dei messaggi o di un altro limite di rete oppure le dimensioni del buffer di ricezione del datagramma sono inferiori quelle del datagramma stesso.
Hope this coud help...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 17 Febbraio 2014, 14:46:28
No, not related to the IDs at all ...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 17 Febbraio 2014, 16:38:47
After six hours I got a high ID. Apart from the connection time, my situation looks the same as of February 12 (port test failed due to UDP, etc.)
EDIT: I lost the high ID less than an hour after I got it... :(


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 18 Febbraio 2014, 09:49:06
This is my verbose log after a few minutes

18/02/2014 08:49:36: Known.met file version is 14 (doesn't support 64bit tags)
18/02/2014 08:49:37: Using 1.60 MB of data for CA clients!
18/02/2014 08:49:38: Using 'C:\Users\THOR\AppData\Local\eMule\config\' as config directory
18/02/2014 08:49:38: Taskbar Notifier Color: R:26 G:19 B:12, Brightness: 20, Transparent: Yes
18/02/2014 08:49:38: Cleaned up known2.met, removed 0 hashsets and purged 0 hashsets of old known files (0 Bytes)
18/02/2014 08:49:38: AICHSyncThread finished
18/02/2014 08:49:38: UploadSpeedSense: Try #1. Collecting hosts...
18/02/2014 08:49:38: ASFU: Starting v3.5...
18/02/2014 08:49:39: Starting Kademlia
18/02/2014 08:49:39: Read 1 source, 3751 keyword, and 46 load entries
18/02/2014 08:49:39: Terminating CIndexed::CLoadDataThread - finished loading data
18/02/2014 08:49:39: Loaded search Spam Filter. Entries - ServerIPs: 0, SourceIPs, 0, Hashs: 0, PositiveHashs: 0, FileSizes: 0, FullNames: 0, SimilarNames: 0
18/02/2014 08:49:41: Starting NODEFWCHECKUDP Kad Search
18/02/2014 08:49:41: Received possible external Kad Port 46760 from 85.65.34.203
18/02/2014 08:49:45: Client TCP socket (OnConnect): Error 10049: Indirizzo richiesto non valido nel proprio contesto.; Client=229.224.51.204 '(null)' (,Connecting/None/None)
18/02/2014 08:49:46: 'http://www.aMule.org' has failed the secure identification, V2 State: 0
18/02/2014 08:49:46: received multiple signatures from one client
18/02/2014 08:49:46: received multiple signatures from one client
18/02/2014 08:49:46: received multiple signatures from one client
18/02/2014 08:49:54: Received possible external Kad Port 46760 from 89.76.165.130
18/02/2014 08:49:54: Set external Kad Port to 46760
18/02/2014 08:49:54: Selected client for UDP Firewallcheck: 78.235.190.111
18/02/2014 08:49:55: Received UDP FirewallCheck packet from 78.235.190.111 with incoming port 46760
18/02/2014 08:49:55: New KAD Firewallstate (UDP): Open, using intern port
18/02/2014 08:49:55: Received UDP FirewallCheck packet from 78.235.190.111 with incoming port 46760
18/02/2014 08:49:56: 'http://emule-project.net' has failed the secure identification, V2 State: 0
18/02/2014 08:49:56: received multiple signatures from one client
18/02/2014 08:49:56: received multiple signatures from one client
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Got enough hosts. Listing the hosts that will be tracerouted:
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Host #1: 91.200.42.46
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Host #2: 83.41.239.72
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Host #3: 176.103.48.36
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Host #4: 91.200.42.119
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Host #5: 91.200.42.47
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Host #6: 151.25.3.227
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Host #7: 79.38.79.17
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Host #8: 77.120.115.66
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Host #9: 46.105.126.71
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Host #10: 78.235.190.111
18/02/2014 08:50:09: UploadSpeedSense: Starting traceroutes to find last common host.
18/02/2014 08:50:10: UploadSpeedSense: Pinging for TTL 1...
18/02/2014 08:50:10: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 192.168.0.1: bytes=0 time=2.23ms (2.23ms 1ms) TTL=1
18/02/2014 08:50:10: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 192.168.0.1: bytes=0 time=1.55ms (1.55ms 0ms) TTL=1
18/02/2014 08:50:10: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 192.168.0.1: bytes=0 time=1.37ms (1.37ms 0ms) TTL=1
18/02/2014 08:50:10: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 192.168.0.1: bytes=0 time=1.29ms (1.29ms 0ms) TTL=1
18/02/2014 08:50:10: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 192.168.0.1: bytes=0 time=1.26ms (1.26ms 0ms) TTL=1
18/02/2014 08:50:10: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 192.168.0.1: bytes=0 time=1.05ms (1.05ms 0ms) TTL=1
18/02/2014 08:50:13: Error from 79.38.79.17: Error=11010
18/02/2014 08:50:13: UploadSpeedSense: Failure #1 to ping host! (TTL: 1 IP: 79.38.79.17 error: 11010). Sleeping 1 sec before retry. Error info follows.
18/02/2014 08:50:13: IP_REQ_TIMED_OUT (11010)
18/02/2014 08:50:18: UploadSpeedSense: Failure #2 to ping host! (TTL: 1 IP: 79.38.79.17 error: 10060). Sleeping 1 sec before retry. Error info follows.
18/02/2014 08:50:18: Pinger: Error 10060: Impossibile stabilire la connessione. Risposta non corretta della parte connessa dopo l'intervallo di tempo oppure mancata risposta dall'host collegato.
18/02/2014 08:50:19: UploadSpeedSense: Unknown pinging error! (TTL: 1 IP: 79.38.79.17 status: 10060). Reason follows. Changing ping method to see if it helps.
18/02/2014 08:50:19: Pinger: Error 10060: Impossibile stabilire la connessione. Risposta non corretta della parte connessa dopo l'intervallo di tempo oppure mancata risposta dall'host collegato.
18/02/2014 08:50:22: UploadSpeedSense: Failure #1 to ping host! (TTL: 1 IP: 77.120.115.66 error: 10060). Sleeping 1 sec before retry. Error info follows.
18/02/2014 08:50:22: Pinger: Error 10060: Impossibile stabilire la connessione. Risposta non corretta della parte connessa dopo l'intervallo di tempo oppure mancata risposta dall'host collegato.
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 192.168.0.1: bytes=0 time=1.64ms (1.64ms 1ms) TTL=1
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 192.168.0.1: bytes=0 time=1.22ms (1.22ms 0ms) TTL=1
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 192.168.0.1: bytes=0 time=1.19ms (1.19ms 0ms) TTL=1
18/02/2014 08:50:23: UploadSpeedSense: Host at TTL 1: 192.168.0.1
18/02/2014 08:50:23: UploadSpeedSense: Pinging for TTL 2...
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=15.10ms (15.10ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.42ms (14.42ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=15.26ms (15.26ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.37ms (14.37ms 13ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=15.22ms (15.22ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.67ms (14.67ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.25ms (14.25ms 13ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=15.32ms (15.32ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=13.91ms (13.91ms 13ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.87ms (14.87ms 13ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:23: UploadSpeedSense: Host at TTL 2: 213.205.0.145
18/02/2014 08:50:23: UploadSpeedSense: Pinging for TTL 3...
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.62.81: bytes=0 time=14.36ms (14.36ms 13ms) TTL=3
18/02/2014 08:50:23: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.62.97: bytes=0 time=14.80ms (14.80ms 14ms) TTL=3
18/02/2014 08:50:23: UploadSpeedSense: Found differing host at TTL 3: 83.41.239.72. This will be the host to ping.
18/02/2014 08:50:23: UploadSpeedSense: Done tracerouting. Evaluating results.
18/02/2014 08:50:23: UploadSpeedSense: Found last common host. LastCommonHost: 213.205.0.145 @ TTL: 2
18/02/2014 08:50:23: UploadSpeedSense: Found last common host. HostToPing: 83.41.239.72
18/02/2014 08:50:23: UploadSpeedSense: Finding a start value for lowest ping...
18/02/2014 08:50:24: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.86ms (14.86ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:24: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.59ms (14.59ms 13ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:24: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=15.11ms (15.11ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:24: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.80ms (14.80ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:24: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.98ms (14.98ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:25: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=15.47ms (15.47ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:25: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.53ms (14.53ms 13ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:25: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.46ms (14.46ms 13ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:25: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=15.14ms (15.14ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:25: Reply (ICMP-pinger) from 213.205.0.145: bytes=0 time=14.87ms (14.87ms 14ms) TTL=2
18/02/2014 08:50:26: UploadSpeedSense: Lowest ping: 20 ms. (Filtered lower values. Lowest ping is never allowed to go under 20 ms)
18/02/2014 08:50:26: UploadSpeedSense: Done with preparations. Starting control of upload speed. (First 60 seconds will be in fast reaction mode)

There are also many strings like these:

18/02/2014 08:59:25: Kad: Request flood detected for opcode 0x44 (0x44) from IP 61.147.76.66 - Droping packets with this opcode
18/02/2014 08:59:28: Kad: Request flood detected for opcode 0x44 (0x44) from IP 183.136.156.7 - Droping packets with this opcode
18/02/2014 08:59:30: Kad: Request flood detected for opcode 0x34 (0x34) from IP 61.147.76.66 - Droping packets with this opcode


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 18 Febbraio 2014, 12:23:10
Looks OK.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 18 Febbraio 2014, 20:28:44
Do your other testers also have this kad ID issues?
I was wondering: I've used 0.50.1.8 for months and it worked so well almost as if it were a release, then I had problems with 1.10 and above. I never used the 1.9 so, just saying, could be useful if we test it...?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 18 Febbraio 2014, 20:44:14
It's useful to test the official builds.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 18 Febbraio 2014, 22:04:26
(http://i.imgur.com/Ad5eOPY.png)

*shrug*

Updates archives once more.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 19 Febbraio 2014, 09:33:43
I don't know what changes you have made​​, but now it works perfectly (High ID, successful port test, "Use UPnP to setup ports" unflagged), no problem after a night running. :good:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 19 Febbraio 2014, 10:48:26
Basically I missed a closing bracket.  :wink2:

Servers working too?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 19 Febbraio 2014, 10:58:25
All fine; even the old red message "...appears to be full" which always appeared when entering/changing a server now is gone.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 19 Febbraio 2014, 11:02:05
That's good, because I don't get High IDs on servers... probably my config. is broken then.

 :bounce:

Anyone tried the Clipboard Watchdog yet?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 19 Febbraio 2014, 14:59:54
High ID for me with this new release (0.50.1.11) both on servers and on kad  :good:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Neo26 - 22 Febbraio 2014, 12:46:04
Link ? :tongue:

Remove the bunny omg :ranting:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 22 Febbraio 2014, 12:49:37
Bunnies gonna jump!


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 22 Febbraio 2014, 18:59:00
Link ? :tongue:

Remove the bunny omg :ranting:


Citazione
https://www.dropbox.com/s/50y1i6q72m3xxe1/nightlybin.7z
https://www.dropbox.com/s/i8hh8pbamoj7ot1/nightlysrc.7z

What's the problem with the bunny?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 13 Luglio 2014, 19:47:37
I updated the archives in order to fix a potential connection issue. Oops!


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 14 Luglio 2014, 19:13:16
 thx :wink:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: OrnitOrincO - 14 Luglio 2014, 23:03:52
Thanks tux, beba running from 13 hours and everything is fine. Just saying, do you swapped the Kad Network and Content-DB (Web) icons in Search tab?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 14 Luglio 2014, 23:05:19
Yes. Accidentally.

Will be fixed with the next update.  :-[


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 15 Luglio 2014, 06:42:42
Thanks tux, beba running from 13 hours and everything is fine. Just saying, do you swapped the Kad Network and Content-DB (Web) icons in Search tab?

i support  :wink:

(http://i57.tinypic.com/28jfm0k.png)

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: THOR - 15 Luglio 2014, 08:03:42
Tnx Tux for your work  :thumbup:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 17 Agosto 2014, 20:28:20
Updated the archives. The icon issue should be fixed.
(And another issue.)

nightlysrc up-to-date, nightlybin will follow within the next few minutes.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 08 Ottobre 2015, 14:24:45
@ tux
any update about your beba ?  :grin:
do you think to add the spread priority ?  :grin:


 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 08 Ottobre 2015, 19:56:40
My current private build is on-par with the latest upstream code. Still waiting for the next eMule updates.
And no, no Spread Priority.  :wink2:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 09 Febbraio 2016, 22:47:31
http://tuxproject.de/nightlybin.7z
http://tuxproject.de/nightlysrc.7z

 :hammer:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 10 Febbraio 2016, 08:03:04
a sort of changelog ?  :angel:

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 10 Febbraio 2016, 08:06:12
Updated to latest upstream code from about one year ago, applied some fixes from the eMule board. Other than that, still nothing big.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: Lucarella - 16 Febbraio 2016, 21:11:29
grazie Tux :cheers: :cheers:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 16 Febbraio 2016, 21:12:41
 :-[


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: dylandog84 - 18 Febbraio 2016, 00:46:59
Thank you Tux.  :)


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 13 Giugno 2018, 11:14:45
Ehy Tux any news?
No new build?

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 13 Giugno 2018, 11:17:06
I had been updating it a few months ago, but I am unable to compile it because of linker issues which I don't really understand...

Does anyone have time and a clue?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: knives88 - 27 Giugno 2018, 17:56:37
Thx for update  Tux.
With UploadSpeedSense activated i can not see the upload /% / ping.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 28 Giugno 2018, 12:02:51
Does a clean configuration work?


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: knives88 - 28 Giugno 2018, 19:15:27
No.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 28 Giugno 2018, 23:02:48
I take my notes... but I can't promise anything. (No fixes without compilation.  :bash: ) Thank you.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 29 Luglio 2018, 16:17:02
I noticed that there is a semi-official 0.51a, developed by fox88. I decided to merge it.
There is a chance for a new beba...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: dylandog84 - 29 Luglio 2018, 22:28:26
Hi Tux! Great News!

Citazione
There is a chance for a new beba...
We will wait your release! :groupwave:

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 29 Luglio 2018, 22:49:24
It will take a while. Dude, that guy was active!


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 30 Luglio 2018, 01:39:22
The good news:
Everything is merged (and probably incomplete).

The bad news:
Build errors: Almost 100.
Warnings: Over 9000! (Not joking. In fact, it's well over 30000.)

I pause for today...


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 30 Luglio 2018, 06:56:53
Build errors: Almost 100.
Warnings: Over 9000! (Not joking. In fact, it's well over 30000.)

 :spav: :spav: :spav: :spav:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 30 Luglio 2018, 07:17:42
 :ranting:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: dylandog84 - 30 Luglio 2018, 22:12:45
Citazione
The bad news:
Build errors: Almost 100.
Warnings: Over 9000! (Not joking. In fact, it's well over 30000.)

EMule slept for many years and most probably your are a little "rusty".  :grin:  It's just a matter of "exercise" (I'm joking, of course  :wink:).

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 30 Luglio 2018, 22:57:34
In fact, I hadn't managed to build a new beba in years anyway. I wish I had released 3.00 earlier... and yes, the last .50b 3.00 beta has been my daily driver since then.  :wink:
I spent the past few years working on my C++ knowledge though.  :grin:

Current state of things: I fixed a number of syntax and linker errors which happened to sneak in while I updated the code. I don't have the feeling that this has made anything better at all. beba is still far from being built.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: dylandog84 - 01 Agosto 2018, 21:47:34
I spent the past few years working on my C++ knowledge though.  :grin:
Another good news.   :notworthy:

Citazione
beba is still far from being built
When you have the time and inspiration to merge your beba, we are here!  :good:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 01 Agosto 2018, 21:58:41
It is already merged ... but there are a number of missing libraries. And libpng does not compile just yet.  :ranting:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 17 Settembre 2018, 22:13:15
Good news: libpng compiles and I updated to eMule 0.51b... and I still have a bunch of errors. Please be patient.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 19 Settembre 2018, 10:01:06
Please be patient.

 :good:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 11 Maggio 2019, 16:38:52
No news?  :angel:

 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 11 Maggio 2019, 17:46:28
Well... thank you for reminding me.

I updated to 0.51c. For relatively obvious reasons, that did not fix all of my problems immediately.

I honestly don't care much about warnings anymore (around 30k of them. Oh geez, is this fucked up  :blink:), but the errors, the errors... something in the libraries is misconfigured.
I'm on it.


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: ss1900 - 21 Settembre 2019, 07:24:45
Well... thank you for reminding me.


 :hello:


Titolo: Re: eMule 0.50a beba 2.72 beta
Post di: tux. - 26 Settembre 2019, 19:51:36
I'm officially too dumb to fix the compiler problems.